The Duke of Sussex's victory in his bid for reinstated automatic armed police protection "could change everything," a royal source highlighted today.
A decision, expected to be in Prince Harry's favour, is slated to be revealed in the upcoming weeks following an extensive effort to reinstate his taxpayer-funded security while staying in the UK.
Harry himself is reportedly optimistic about the success, which is anticipated to ease his worries about occasionally bringing his children to the UK.
This verdict might also enable King Charles to meet young Archie and Lilibet for the first time since June 2022, when Lilibet had just celebrated her first birthday.
However, analysts note that the judgment could spark major debate, potentially enabling Harry and Meghan Markle, Duchess of Sussex, to operate as "half in, half out" royals.
A close friend of the royals remarked, "A victory for Harry and Meghan would change the landscape entirely."
Richard Eden, an experienced royal journalist with two decades in the field, noted: "They (Harry and Meghan) would enjoy the significant advantage of automatic taxpayer-funded security but without the obligations tied to public service."

Harry, now 41, has disclosed that his security concerns are a significant hurdle in visiting the UK, and why he hesitates to bring his children; a security improvement could alleviate this obstacle.
This claim has seemingly been weighed by the Government’s Royal and VIP Executive Committee, which will announce its decision soon.
However, the armed police security would be funded by British taxpayers, a privilege usually reserved for "working royals" — like the King’s siblings, Princess Anne and Prince Edward — only when they perform public duties.
Harry and Meghan, however, do not engage in public responsibilities yet would benefit from constant protection while in the UK.
Mr Eden commented critically in his Daily Mail piece: "Imposing a financial burden on already strained British taxpayers to cover the security costs for the Sussexes could trigger outrage.
This is the same couple so affluent that Harry could personally contribute £1.1 million to Children in Need on his last UK visit in September.
"Not only would this decision concern taxpayers out of fear of a ruling favouring Harry, but it could unsettle the Royal Family...
"There's still time to reconsider before the declining Sussexes are given a potentially unwelcome accolade by the British Establishment."
During his last visit to the UK in September, Prince Harry had a confidential meeting with his father in London, seen as a significant move toward mending family ties.